Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cagetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
Right arrow G12 - Asset Pricing
Right arrow G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
Right arrow O33 - Technological Change: Choices and [...]
Right arrow O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rev Fin 2002; 15:363-404
© 2002 the Society for Financial Studies

Robustness and Pricing with Uncertain Growth

Marco Cagetti
University of Virginia

Lars Peter Hansen
University of Chicago

Thomas Sargent
Stanford University

Noah Williams
Princeton University

Abstract

We study how decision-makers' concerns about robustness affect prices and quantities in a stochastic growth model. In the model economy, growth rates in technology are altered by infrequent large shocks and continuous small shocks. An investor observes movements in the technology level but cannot perfectly distinguish their sources. Instead the investor solves a signal extraction problem. We depart from most of the macroeconomics and finance literature by presuming that the investor treats the specification of technology evolution as an approximation. To promote a decision rule that is robust to model misspecification, an investor acts as if a malevolent player threatens to perturb the actual data-generating process relative to his approximating model. We study how a concern about robustness alters asset prices. We show that the dynamic evolution of the risk-return trade-off is dominated by movements in the growth-state probabilities and that the evolution of the dividend-price ratio is driven primarily by the capital-technology ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
M. Lettau, S. C. Ludvigson, and J. A. Wachter
The Declining Equity Premium: What Role Does Macroeconomic Risk Play?
Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2008; 21(4): 1653 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
P. Boyle, S. Feng, W. Tian, and T. Wang
Robust Stochastic Discount Factors
Rev. Financ. Stud., May 1, 2008; 21(3): 1077 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
M. Leippold, F. Trojani, and P. Vanini
Learning and Asset Prices Under Ambiguous Information
Rev. Financ. Stud., September 12, 2007; (2007) hhm035v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
L. Garlappi, R. Uppal, and T. Wang
Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach
Rev. Financ. Stud., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 41 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 REV FINANC STUDHome page
P. J. Maenhout
Robust Portfolio Rules and Asset Pricing
Rev. Financ. Stud., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 951 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.