| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rev Fin 1998; 11:679-704
© 1998 the Society for Financial Studies
Article |
Takeover bidding with toeholds: the case of the owner's curse
Olin School of Business, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA
e-mail: singh@wuolin.wustl.edu
Abstract
This article demonstrates that a potential acquirer with a toehold bids aggressively and possibly overpays in equilibrium. The aggressiveness of a bidder with a toehold increases further if he is able to renege on his winning bid. A bidder without a toehold, however, responds by shading his bids. The target firm can increase competition and the expected sale price if it only entertains nonretractable bids. This article provides testable implications on the probability of bidder success, stock price reactions on bid revisions and on resolution of the contest, and expected gains to bidders and the target firm.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Mathews Optimal Equity Stakes and Corporate Control Rev. Financ. Stud., July 1, 2007; 20(4): 1059 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Povel and R. Singh Takeover Contests with Asymmetric Bidders Rev. Financ. Stud., December 1, 2006; 19(4): 1399 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
